![]() |
|
|
March 31st, 2005 |
|
Chinese Christians React to New Religious Regulations |
|
In a communiqué from Intercessors Network they
report on an article by Xu Mei concerning the
new religious regulations instituted by the
Chinese government. The following is an
excerpt from that report. On March 1, China
adopted the new Regulations on Religious
Affairs, first announced by the government in
December 2004. The government claims the new
regulations are a step towards religious
freedom. However, some Christian leaders have
expressed serious concerns, particularly with
the issue of church registration.
Last year, the government carried out a survey of unregistered house churches using members of the Protestant Three Self Patriotic Movement (TSPM) churches who had contact with unregistered Christians. Results showed there were several thousand unregistered meeting points in Beijing, with over 100,000 members—far outnumbering the 30,000 Protestants registered with the TSPM.
However, registration has long been a source
of tension and debate in China. Unregistered
churches oppose registration mainly on two
grounds. First, they believe Christ rather
than any political body is the head of the
Christian church. Second, registered churches
are subject to much tighter control over
administration, church activities, and the
ordination and training of leaders. Protestant
house church members also object to the
political theology of the
government-controlled Three Self Patriotic
Movement (TSPM), which oversees the activities
of registered Protestant churches.
The new regulations have already sparked
vigorous debate among house church leaders.
In Beijing, some younger house church leaders have taken an optimistic view. They believe legal recognition would mean they could establish government-approved kindergartens and health clinics.
The new regulations apparently allow churches
to register directly with the government
rather than with the TSPM that house churches
oppose. Some fear registration could divide
and weaken the house church movement as the
older generation of house church leaders see
the TSPM as a tool of the Communist Party.
The son of one such leader, who is involved in
outreach to intellectuals believes the new
regulations will lead to tighter control. ”The
Party wants to crack down on house church
training schools. This had already happened in
Anhui as the regulations are not set in
concrete. The Party could further refine and
improved the regulations leading to more
control.”
House church leaders a thousand miles south of Beijing also expressed their concern. ”We are worried about what may happen after March 1. We don’t mind too much about registering with the government through the Public Security Bureau, but we do mind interference from the State Administration of Religious Affairs [SARA, formerly the Religious Affairs Bureau] and the TSPM. "Things have been fairly open in our area for the last two years. Now we will just have to wait and see.”
Legal experts have criticized the vague
wording of the regulations. For example,
Article 3 guarantees protection of ”normal”
religious activities. ”Normal” is not defined,
but from the context it seems to apply only to
registered churches.
Article 14 says churches applying for registration must be ”rationally distributed.” At a conference in the U.S. in late February, Rev. Cao ShengJie of the China Christian Council explained that churches would not be allowed on every street corner, but would be ”rationally” located to avoid duplication of facilities.
Article 14 also says a church applying for
registration must have ”religious personnel or
other persons who are qualified under the
prescription of the religion concerned.” This
creates difficulties for house churches, since
members of unregistered churches do not
qualify for admission to China’s 18
government-approved religious seminaries.
A Hong Kong Chinese pastor who has worked with
the church on the mainland for many years
commented, ”On the surface, the Party’s new
Religious Affairs regulations appear to be
more relaxed than previously. Now religion
will be managed from the top rather than by
suppression and brute force as in the past.”
However, ”the Party still sees itself as in
sole control of the government and of
ideology. The new religious policy is more
concrete than before. It spells out clearly
the punishments for those who break the new
regulations.
"We will have to wait and see whether China
really wants to liberalize its religious
policies,” he continued. ”To some extent, the
new President Hu Jintao is more conservative
than Jiang Zemin, so religious policy may even
have regressed. But as the number of religious
believers continues to multiply, the Party
will have to make greater concessions on
religion in the future.”
|